Using Scratch Storage in Jobs

Overview

Questions

• Why should I use temporary storage during jobs?
• How do I access /scratch in my job scripts?
• How do I safely copy data in and out of scratch?
• What are the failure modes that lose results, and how do I prevent them?

Objectives

After completing this episode, participants will be able to: - Explain the performance benefits of scratch storage - Access scratch storage using SLURM environment variables - Implement the copy-in, compute, copy-out pattern - Avoid losing results by copying back before the job ends - Diagnose I/O bottlenecks that scratch can fix

Why Use Scratch?

---

Scratch storage provides significant performance advantages because the data lives on local NVMe SSDs inside the compute node, not on the cluster’s shared NFS mounts:

/rhome or /bigdata:  ~20-50 MB/s   (network filesystem, contended)
/scratch:            ~100-300 MB/s  (local SSD, dedicated to your job)

For a job reading 10 GB of data, this means completing in 30-50 seconds on scratch versus 200+ seconds on /rhome: a 4-7x speedup. For machine learning, simulation, and any pipeline that re-reads the same files thousands of times during training, the cumulative savings are even larger.

The performance gap matters most when many jobs are reading from /bigdata simultaneously. BeeGFS spreads data across several storage servers, but that bandwidth is still shared between everyone using the filesystem. If five jobs on five different nodes are all reading from /bigdata/lab/<labname>/ at once, each gets a fraction of the available bandwidth. /scratch is local: each job has the full disk to itself.

Copy in, work on the fast local disk, copy out before the job ends.

Callout

Scratch Is Non-Persistent

Data on /scratch is deleted when your job completes. Always copy results back to /rhome or /bigdata before the job ends. If you forget, your results are permanently lost.

There is no “but I had it five minutes ago” recovery. The cleanup is immediate when SLURM marks the job complete. Build the copy-out step into every script that uses scratch, and verify it before requesting time on a long run.

Accessing Scratch in Job Scripts

---

SLURM provides environment variables for constructing scratch paths:

BASH

$SLURM_JOB_USER    # Your username
$SLURM_JOB_ID      # Unique job ID number

Full scratch path: /scratch/$SLURM_JOB_USER/$SLURM_JOB_ID

This per-job directory naming matters. If you used /scratch/alice/work/ and submitted ten jobs at once, they would all write to the same directory and trash each other’s intermediate files. The $SLURM_JOB_ID keeps each job’s workspace isolated.

The Standard Pattern: Copy-In, Compute, Copy-Out

---

BASH

#!/bin/bash
#SBATCH --job-name=process_data
#SBATCH --time=04:00:00
#SBATCH --mem=32G

# Set up paths
SCRATCH_DIR=/scratch/$SLURM_JOB_USER/$SLURM_JOB_ID
mkdir -p $SCRATCH_DIR

echo "=== Stage 1: Copy input data to scratch ==="
rsync -avhP /rhome/<myusername>/input/*.dat $SCRATCH_DIR/

echo "=== Stage 2: Run computation ==="
cd $SCRATCH_DIR
./myanalysis *.dat

echo "=== Stage 3: Copy results back ==="
rsync -avhP $SCRATCH_DIR/output*.h5 /rhome/<myusername>/results/

echo "=== Job complete ==="

The pattern has three deliberate stages and each carries a lesson. Stage 1 stages all input data so subsequent reads hit local SSD instead of the network. Stage 2 does the work in scratch where I/O is fast. Stage 3 copies results back to persistent storage before the SLURM job ends, ensuring nothing is lost when scratch is cleaned.

rsync -avhP is preferred over cp because it shows progress, preserves attributes, and is restartable if it gets interrupted. The -h makes sizes human-readable and -P shows progress and supports partial transfers.

Checking Available Space

---

Before copying large datasets, verify space is available:

BASH

SCRATCH_DIR=/scratch/$SLURM_JOB_USER/$SLURM_JOB_ID
mkdir -p $SCRATCH_DIR

AVAIL_SPACE=$(df $SCRATCH_DIR | tail -1 | awk '{print $4}')
NEEDED_SPACE=$((5 * 1024 * 1024))  # 5 GB in KB

if [ $AVAIL_SPACE -lt $NEEDED_SPACE ]; then
    echo "ERROR: Not enough space on scratch"
    exit 1
fi

This is most useful for jobs that copy a few hundred GB of data. For smaller jobs, the check is overkill. The key idea: failing fast at job start is much cheaper than failing four hours into a run because scratch filled up halfway through.

Multi-Stage Pipelines

---

Chain multiple processing stages on scratch to avoid round-tripping through NFS:

BASH

#!/bin/bash
#SBATCH --job-name=pipeline
#SBATCH --time=08:00:00

SCRATCH_DIR=/scratch/$SLURM_JOB_USER/$SLURM_JOB_ID
mkdir -p $SCRATCH_DIR
cd $SCRATCH_DIR

rsync -avhP /rhome/<myusername>/raw_data/ $SCRATCH_DIR/input/
./preprocess input/ -o preprocessed/
./analyze preprocessed/ -o analysis/

# Copy all results back
rsync -avhP analysis/ /rhome/<myusername>/results/analysis/

The intermediate preprocessed/ directory never leaves scratch. It does not need to: the next stage reads it locally. This pattern is the single biggest performance win you can get from rewriting a multi-stage pipeline on HPC.

Real-World Example: Machine Learning

---

BASH

#!/bin/bash
#SBATCH --job-name=train_model
#SBATCH --time=04:00:00
#SBATCH --gpus=1
#SBATCH --mem=32G

SCRATCH=/scratch/$SLURM_JOB_USER/$SLURM_JOB_ID
mkdir -p $SCRATCH

rsync -avhP /rhome/<myusername>/training_data.h5 $SCRATCH/
cd $SCRATCH
python train.py --data training_data.h5 --output model.pkl

# Save results to permanent storage
rsync -avhP model.pkl /rhome/<myusername>/results/

For ML training in particular, scratch is essentially mandatory. PyTorch DataLoaders with num_workers > 0 issue many parallel reads, and NFS handles parallel reads from one client poorly. Reading from local SSD avoids GPU starvation entirely.

Callout

Failure modes that silently lose results

The two failure modes that bite people, in order of frequency:

The script’s compute step fails, the copy-out step is skipped (because of set -e or just script flow), and scratch gets cleaned. Mitigation: always run the copy-out unconditionally. Use a trap or an if block, but make sure it executes even on failure.

The job hits its time limit during the compute step. SLURM kills it; copy-out never runs. Mitigation: budget extra time for copy-out, and consider a signal directive that gives your script a few minutes’ warning before the timeout.

BASH

#SBATCH --signal=B:USR1@300   # send USR1 5 minutes before timeout

trap 'rsync -avhP results/ /rhome/$USER/results/; exit' USR1

Challenge

Challenge: Scratch Performance Test

Create two job scripts: one writing to /rhome and one to /scratch:

Without scratch:

BASH

#!/bin/bash
#SBATCH --job-name=no_scratch
#SBATCH --time=00:05:00

cd /rhome/<myusername>
time dd if=/dev/zero of=test_1gb.dat bs=1M count=1024
rm test_1gb.dat

With scratch:

BASH

#!/bin/bash
#SBATCH --job-name=with_scratch
#SBATCH --time=00:05:00

SCRATCH=/scratch/$SLURM_JOB_USER/$SLURM_JOB_ID
mkdir -p $SCRATCH
cd $SCRATCH
time dd if=/dev/zero of=test_1gb.dat bs=1M count=1024

Compare the “real” time from each. How much faster was scratch?

Show me the solution

Typical results:

Without scratch: real 0m12.456s
With scratch:    real 0m3.821s
Improvement:     3.3x faster

For a 4-hour I/O-intensive job, this difference multiplies significantly: 12 minutes saved per GB of throughput, or roughly an hour saved per 5 GB of working set.

The result varies with cluster load: when /bigdata is contended by many simultaneous users, the gap can stretch to 10x or more.

Challenge

Challenge: Diagnose a Lost Result

A graduate student reports that her 6-hour SLURM job ran successfully (final output line: “Analysis complete”), but the result file analysis_summary.csv is nowhere to be found in her home directory. List two likely explanations and how to fix each for next time.

Show me the solution

Explanation 1: the script wrote to /scratch/$USER/$SLURM_JOB_ID/ but never copied the result back to /rhome or /bigdata. The file was deleted when SLURM cleaned scratch. Fix: add an rsync step at the end of the script. Check the SLURM output file (slurm-JOBID.out) for any errors near the end.

Explanation 2: the script wrote to a relative path (./analysis_summary.csv) without cd-ing first. The file is in whatever directory sbatch was invoked from, which may not be where she is looking. Fix: use absolute paths or explicit cd at the start.

In both cases, find /rhome/$USER /bigdata -name "analysis_summary.csv" -mtime -1 will quickly locate any candidate file from the last 24 hours.

Key Points

• Scratch (/scratch/$SLURM_JOB_USER/$SLURM_JOB_ID) provides 4-7x faster I/O than /rhome
• Scratch is deleted when your job completes; always copy results back unconditionally
• Use the copy-in, compute, copy-out pattern for all I/O-intensive jobs
• Multi-stage pipelines should keep intermediate files on scratch, not round-trip through NFS
• Check available space before copying large datasets to fail fast
• Use a trap with --signal to copy results out even if the job hits its time limit
• ML training is essentially mandatory on scratch because of DataLoader parallel reads